Sunday, November 23, 2025
Abilene, Kansas and Snowfall
Thursday, November 6, 2025
The Gospel of Linus: Happy Birthday to me
Before I say anything else—let me begin with Linus.
There he stands on a stage that’s falling apart. Snoopy’s
dancing, the lights are wrong, the Christmas play is unraveling, and yet he
steps forward—small, calm, blanket in hand—and says the words that redeem the
chaos: “Lights, please.”
It’s one of the great theatrical moments in American
animation: a child asking for light, stepping into it, and telling the truth.
That’s the energy I’m trying to channel these days. Not the
cool detachment of Charlie Brown’s despair, not Lucy’s control, but the
openhearted steadiness of Linus. His tenderness. His insistence on sincerity
when everything around him is absurd.
So—lights, please.
Happy birthday to me.
I write this because I’ve been living this family story in
semi-public view, and it feels right to bring it into the light. To tell the
truth plainly. Writing in this space keeps me accountable—to myself, to those
who read, and to the person I hope to be: honorable, kind, trustworthy,
transparent. Tender, even. I know I’ll fall short, but I’ve come to believe
that it’s the effort—the practice of trying—that matters most. Perhaps, in the
end, nothing matters at all. But I keep sharing because it steadies me, like
speaking aloud in the dark just to hear one’s own voice come back.
If you’re new to this patch of internet, you might want to
read back; this is the middle of a sentence.
For those who know the earlier chapters: my birthday was
last week, November 1st. Several years ago—on that very day—my brother, Jaxon
Ravens, chose my birthday as the stage for his cruelty. That morning, while
I was answering kind messages from friends, his first venomous email arrived.
Then another. Then another.
He accused me of theft, deceit, obstruction—the same tired
lies about the photographs my father left in his will, images I’d been
entrusted to safeguard. The timing wasn’t accidental. It was a terror tactic,
engineered to inflict maximum harm: a strike of fear and shame on the day I was
supposed to feel seen.
Hitchcock might have called those photographs a MacGuffin—the
meaningless object everyone chases so the real story can unfold elsewhere. For
Jaxon, they were that and more: the key to his private mythology, where control
masquerades as justice. But a chase requires two runners, and I refused to run.
So he hurled his words like stones instead, hoping to draw blood from distance.
When he failed, he widened the attack—sending versions of
those same emails to my friends, a theater of humiliation with no audience but
himself. It was transparent bullying, and even then, I tried to remain steady.
Calm. Boundaried. Transparent.
That same year, my mother likely sent her usual birthday
card, accompanied by the traditional check matching my age—a small ritual of
affection she’s maintained for decades. The following year, the check
disappeared. A minor detail, perhaps, but I recognized it instantly: a quiet
rebuke disguised as omission. The card itself was wrapped in that familiar
duality—sweet sentiment laced with accusation. Happy Birthday, she
wrote, I think of you often, followed by a lament about my supposed
“hostility.”
I laughed—sardonically, because what else can you do when
cruelty arrives dressed as kindness? I tucked the card into a drawer with the
rest of the relics: artifacts too toxic to touch yet too revealing to throw
away.
Between that birthday and this one, I tried again to repair
what was broken. I reached out to both of them—my mother and my brother—with
what I can only describe as Linus-level sincerity. Remember his
monologue in It’s the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown?
“Each year, the Great Pumpkin rises out of the pumpkin patch
that he thinks is the most sincere. He’s gotta pick this one. He’s got to. I
don’t see how a pumpkin patch can be more sincere than this one.”
That was me. My pumpkin patch was nothing but sincerity.
You can read that attempt in my earlier post, “What It
Looks Like When a Mother Disowns Her Son.”
My brother’s reply: silence.
My mother’s: “The bridges have been burned.”
That message arrived just weeks before this birthday.
And yet, despite the ashes she invoked, a new card appeared
in my mailbox last week.
I held it, feeling the weight of its irony. I knew I
wouldn’t open it—not out of fear, but self-protection. I’ve learned that calm
has a cost, and sometimes the price is silence. So I sent the card back,
unopened, wrapped in the following letter:
Dear Mom,
Thank you for the birthday card. I’m returning
it unopened, though I want to acknowledge the gesture and the care it may have
been meant to carry. I’d like to believe it was sent in kindness, and I’ll hold
that possibility with gratitude.
There’s an irony in writing a letter to explain why I’m
returning one, and I recognize that. But this feels like the most honest way to
speak right now. My intention isn’t to turn away—it’s to preserve the
possibility of a different kind of exchange when the time comes.
The truth is, I’m cautious. In the past, cards or notes
have carried words that, even if well-intentioned, left me feeling unseen or
misrepresented—especially when my boundaries or quiet distance were described
as hostility. I’m not willing to risk that again. I’m working hard to maintain
the steadiness and calm that have become essential to my well-being, and I’m
learning that peace requires clear banks, the way a river requires its shape.
I’m also aware
that silence can wound as deeply as speech. In the face of my brother’s abject
cruelty—the messages, the public disparagement—your abstention on this subject
has felt, at times, like an echo of that silence. I don’t say this to condemn,
only to name what has been painful and real.
In my earlier message, I asked for something simple: a
genuine conversation, shared space, both of us present with humility and care.
That invitation still stands. What I can no longer do is participate in one-way
communication that leaves no room for listening or repair.
Returning this
card is just a way of honoring those boundaries. My life is good now—filled
with meaningful work, kind people, and the small daily joys of watching my son
grow into himself. I want to keep building from that ground of honesty and
quiet gratitude.
So I’ll send the card back with respect, trusting that
the gesture can rest between us as enough for now. If the day comes when we can
meet face-to-face and speak openly, I’ll be ready to listen. Until then, I’m
choosing calm waters.
With sincerity and care,
Ben
It was the gentlest truth I could offer: that love without
respect is noise, and silence, though painful, can sometimes protect what’s
sacred. I ended the letter with a wish for stillness—for both of us. When I
mailed it, I felt peace. Not triumph, not righteousness—just quiet certainty
that I had acted in alignment with myself.
This year’s birthday was simple and good. I spent the day
running errands with my partner, both of us laughing at nothing, reveling in
the ordinariness of our togetherness. We had barbecue for dinner, cocktails at
home, and watched a favorite movie. Nothing dramatic—just the soft contentment
of a life built on peace.
As for the year ahead—I can’t predict its shape. But I know
I have no interest in living by fear or piety or guilt. Those are currencies of
a past I’ve already spent. What I want now is light.
Which brings me back to Linus.
I don’t celebrate a particularly Christ-centered Christmas,
but I love its rituals—the music, the glow, the small warmth of shared
anticipation. And I love A Charlie Brown Christmas. Linus steps into the
chaos, asks for light, and quotes Luke 2—not as a sermon, but as a song of
clarity:
“Fear not,” he says, dropping his blanket, “for behold, I
bring you good tidings of great joy.”
Faith replacing fear.
That small act has always undone me. A child drops the one
thing that comforts him and finds steadiness in the truth he speaks aloud. It’s
everything I’ve been trying to practice—releasing the blanket, standing in the
light, refusing the noise of intimidation, and trusting that sincerity is its
own form of grace.
So here’s to another year of trying to be a little more like
Linus.
To speak plainly.
To lead with sincerity.
To step into the light when everything feels like it’s falling apart.
Bridges may be burned, but the path ahead still glows.
Here’s to calm waters, open hands, and hearts turned toward the light.
To revelation in simplicity.
To light breaking into darkness.
To peace and goodwill—within, between, and beyond.
Lights, please.
The Smoke Beneath the Floorboards
He was taller than most men of his time — six feet or near to it — I imagine him with a soldier’s posture, long arms, and a beard that shadowed his face like the bristles of a worn brush.
Dark hair, his eyes described by one witness as “fierce yet melancholy.”
Years of war had likely carved lines along his cheeks and left his hands calloused, stained with the residue of smoke and saltpeter.
This was Guy Fawkes — a man who had spent a decade fighting for Spain against Protestant England, only to return home carrying a conviction sharper than any sword: the kind of faith that leads people to do rash things.
And so he crouched in the chamber under Parliament, lantern flickering in the wet air, beside thirty-six barrels of gunpowder stacked like the vertebrae of an idea too heavy to stand upright.
Above him, London moved unknowing — merchants haggling, priests sermonizing, the river sliding past like a patient witness. Could it have ever been more silent than the moment before?
It was November 1605, and one man believed he might change the course of a kingdom with one spark.
A Spark in the Cellar
It doesn’t look like it was Fawkes’ idea- he was just the engineer. The match. The blueprint belonged to Robert Catesby — a Catholic bruised by years of fines and suspicion.
He and his circle had prayed and plotted in equal measure, men who saw themselves not as villains but as exiles in their own country. They called their plan deliverance.
The state called it treason.
They rented a cellar beneath the House of Lords and filled it with barrels until the air itself felt combustible.
Fawkes was chosen to guard the charge because he alone had the patience for it — and perhaps because he’d already made peace with death.
But empires, even decaying ones, are built on paranoia.
An unsigned letter reached Lord Monteagle warning him to stay away from Parliament “for they shall receive a terrible blow this Parliament, and yet they shall not see who hurts them.”
By dawn, the guards had found the barrels, the fuses, and the tall man with the quiet eyes who did not flinch when they seized him.
He gave his name as John Johnson.
He was interrogated, tortured, broken, and eventually confessed.
The others fled north and were cornered at Holbeche House, dying under musket fire.
By January, their heads hung on spikes above London Bridge — real old-school London stuff — a grim necklace of loyalty restored.
Yet history never quite ends with the executioner’s knot. It lingers — like smoke rising through rafters, impossible to scrub from the stone.
Remember, remember, the fifth of November,
Gunpowder, treason, and plot...
We remember, though rarely what for.
Faith, Fear, and the Machinery of Power
I don’t think the Gunpowder Plot was madness — I think more likely, it was exhaustion.
It was the desperation of men whose prayers had been outlawed, whose children were forbidden baptism in their own faith, whose homes were searched for hidden altars.
When the government makes worship itself a crime, rebellion becomes a kind of prayer.
And yet — what does it mean to ignite a righteous cause with the tools of destruction?
There’s a lesson there, one that stretches from Stuart England to the present:
when a system walls off justice, people will always look for a tunnel.
The monarchy survived, as monarchies do, by rewriting the story.
Fawkes became an evil spirit invoked to frighten children, his name synonymous with treachery.
The ensuing annual bonfire was not a warning to tyrants but a comfort to them — the burning of rebellion made ritual, safe, and state-approved.
Centuries later, we’re still told to celebrate stability over dissent.
Our own governments do it differently — not with gallows, but with algorithms and debt.
They burn us slower.
Echoes in the Present
Today, we live under a subtler architecture of control — one that replaces religion with market faith.
Instead of criminalizing worship, it criminalizes poverty.
Instead of barring communion, it prices it.
The ruling class no longer crowns itself with gold, but with profit margins and campaign donors.
And still, the cellar fills:
with medical bills stacked like gunpowder,
with housing costs and student loans,
with the smoldering frustration of people told to be patient while wealth consolidates above their heads.
The danger now isn’t that someone will light the fuse — it’s that too many have forgotten it’s there.
It may be that democratic socialism, at its heart, is an attempt to reroute that energy — to replace the explosion with construction, to build the just society before desperation builds the fire.
It says: don’t blow it up. Open it up.
The Human Remainder
On January 31, 1606, they marched Guy Fawkes to the scaffold.
The story says he climbed halfway, then leapt — snapping his neck rather than give the crowd the spectacle of his dismemberment.
It was a small, defiant mercy — the last act of a man who refused to let power choreograph his death.
Four hundred years later, his face has become a mask — the stylized grin of protestors, hackers, marchers.
Sometimes cheapened, sometimes profound.
Every generation remakes him, because every generation rediscovers what it means to live under a government deaf to its own citizens.
When I hear the rhyme now, I don’t think of Parliament or the crown.
I think of a man with blackened hands, staring into the dark, believing that one spark might make the world listen.
And I think of how some still chant his name, half in jest, half in longing — as if deep down, they’re all still waiting for someone to bring a little light to the cellar.
Remember, remember — not the explosion that never came, but the reasons someone wanted to light the fuse at all.
